Active Record's find_each & find_in_batches: Use error_on_ignored_order!

By ScreenStaring
grep 'Scoped order is' log/*.log

Is your Rails application emitting this warning? Were you aware of this?

Several responses to a recent question on Reddit about Active Record performance suggested using .find_each and .find_in_batches (there’s also .in_batches). While these methods are well-known the trivial ways to prevent the subtle bug they can cause seems to be unknown or ignored.

The Problem

You create an Active Record Relation with a defined ordering, e.g., Model.order("some_column desc"), then call .find_each or a similar batch method on it. You expect this to return records ordered by some_column in descending order. It doesn’t.

This is no secret. From the docs:

NOTE: It's not possible to set the order. That is automatically set to ascending on the primary key (“id ASC”)
to make the batch ordering consistent. Therefore the primary key must be orderable, e.g. an integer or a string.

When an order is set Active Record’s default behavior is to output a warning:

Scoped order is ignored, it's forced to be batch order.

Not ideal.

While a basic case like MyModel.order("some_column").find_each may be easy to identify, cases where the ordered Relation is passed as an argument to other methods that then call one of the batch retrieval methods on it can be a bigger source of problems (and technically it’s not mutating the caller’s argument).

Here’s a somewhat recent case I encountered where a reservation should be made on the first available opening. “First available opening” depends on the applicable scheduling algorithm. If the user requesting the reservation is a high roller, i.e. PremiumMember, they’ll have access to different set of openings than other users.

The names and most of the code have been changed/removed to protect the guilty. Note that the strategy pattern is used to apply the user-appropriate algorithm:

class ReservationStrategy
  # snip irrelevant code...
  def reserve(request)
    raise NotImplementedError


  def make_reservation(openings, request)
    openings.find_each do |reservation|
      # reserve the first opening based on some common scheduling logic then break

class FirstComeFirstServed < ReservationStrategy
  def reserve(request)
      Reservation.soonest_available(request.time, request.quantity),

class PremiumMember < ReservationStrategy
  def reserve(request)
    openings = Reservation.or(, Reservation.booked_on_or_around(request.time))
    # some propriety and confidential logic on openings and request that results in an ordering
    openings = openings.order(propriety_and_confidential_ordering)

    make_reservation(openings, request)

And used like so:

strategy =
reservation = strategy.reserve(request)

The problem happens in ReservationStrategy. Since find_each is used the results are ordered by id and not the order defined by the ReservationStrategy subclass. This can result in a reservation that’s not made on the correct/soonest opening.

But the warning was output…


Yes a test can catch this but only if you create Reservation records in non-chronological order (a good rule of thumb, really). And if your test coverage is not 100% (whose is?), an order-breaking, bug causing call to find_each can slip through.

Prevention Via error_on_ignored_order

I don’t think the current default behavior is ideal for most (all?) scenarios. Instead of outputting a warning when the ordering is discarded one can force the batch methods to raise an exception. There are 3 ways to do this:

  1. Set the error_on_ignore argument to true
  2. Set Model.error_on_ignored_order to true
  3. Set error_on_ignored_order to true globally

I prefer 3. Set it and forget it. It’s a sane default. Now calls like this:

Reservation.order("availabe_at desc").find_each { }

Result in:

ArgumentError (Scoped order is ignored, it's forced to be batch order.)

No silent warnings. No silent bugs. Instead of scheduling the wrong date we don’t schedule at all. You may even get a test failure somewhere. Yay.

The cases where you want the warning are few –if any. When you do just override the default at the call site (option 1) or class-wide (option 2).

Is Anybody Overriding Active Record’s Default?

This functionality was added in Rails 5 but is anyone using it? I have not seen it used in any of the many Rails applications I’ve worked on since 2016 when the option was added. At least not initially. And a large portion of these applications had warnings in their logs.

Some quick DuckDuckGoing turns up only a mention of it on Nothing else outside of docs.

StackOverflow? Nothing: 1, 2

GitHub? Nope: 1, 2, 3

The venerable Rubocop has no rule for it. Maybe it should?

For applications created before Rails 5 I understand. Code was ported to be Rails 5 compatible, tests passed, and folks moved on to whatever the backlog bequeathed. But for new applications, having this raise an error is an important bug preventing default. Does anyone else think so? It’s not clear.